Legal Opinion

Peoples State Bank v. Trombly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1928No. Docket No. 90PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

At the opening of the trial, the defendant Trombly obtained leave to amend his plea of the general issue theretofore filed, by attaching thereto a notice of special defense. In it he stated:

"1. The defendant Columbus Trombly will show that the defendant the Adams Lumber Company is a nonexistent, fictitious person.
"2. The defendant Columbus Trombly will show that on or about the first day of May, 1920, he became indebted to the defendant the Adams Lumber Company, or Gustave Munz, in the sum of three thousand six hundred ($3,600) dollars for lumber furnished by said defendant Gustave Munz, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Pontiac Savings Bank v. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Rolland Township v. PakesMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vachon v. TodorovichMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Lincoln Investment Co. v. MetrosMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hixson v. BorenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API