Legal Opinion

State v. Kurita

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1925No. 19173. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— The state brings this action for the purpose of escheating seven and one-half acres of land, in King county, which it claims is owned by Ryoton Kurita, an alien, who has not declared his intention of becoming a citizen of the United States. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment dismissing the action from which the state appeals.

The land in question is suitable for agricultural purposes, and is located approximately two miles east of Lake Washington. On October 27, 1909, W. E. Con way and wife, being then tbe owners, contracted to sell the seven and one-half…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Oregon Mortgage Co. v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nath v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Pederson v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dutton v. DonahueWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Saunders v. VisserWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State v. IshikawaWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State v. KusumiWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. State v. KusumiWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API