Legal Opinion

Oregon Mortgage Co. v. Carstens

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1896No. 2390PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Richard Osborn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*166The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This case presents the question of the power and right of an alien corporation to acquire and hold real estate within the State of Washington. The plaintiff loaned a sum of money to one McIntosh and took a mortgage to secure the payment thereof on certain lands, and McIntosh being unable to pay the same, said parties entered into an agreement whereby he executed a deed of the lands to one Livingstone as trustee for the plaintiff, and Livingstone subsequently deeded to the plaintiff. Thereafter the plaintiff and the defendant Carstens entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cross v. De ValleSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. Carlow v. C. Aultman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Phillips v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. American Mortgage Co. v. TennilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Williams v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Louisville School Board v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Abrams v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State Ex Rel. Short v. Benevolent Inv. & Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API