Legal Opinion

State v. Ishikawa

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1926No. 19808. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The judgment of dismissal of this action, for the reason that the complaint is too weak to withstand a general demurrer, must be affirmed.

The action was brought for the purpose of escheat-ing farming land on the ground that it was held by aliens in violation of the constitution and laws of this state. The first paragraph of the complaint charges that the respondents W. Ishikawa and Kiyo Ishikawa are Japanese husband and wife, and that the respondent Nellie Ishikawa is a minor American citizen. There is no allegation of any relationship between the minor and the other respondents bearing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KosaiWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. NatsuharaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. KuritaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Stambaugh v. LungIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamp v. Universal Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Paul v. BenavidezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API