Legal Opinion

Kenner v. Watha

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1982No. Docket 50638PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This paternity action culminated with a jury finding that defendant was the father of Brian James Kenner, a child born to plaintiff. An appropriate order of filiation was entered and, following denial of his motion for new trial, defendant appeals as of right.

Defendant first argues that he is entitled to a new trial because blood tests were not taken and submitted for the jury’s consideration. See MCL 722.716; MSA 25.496.1 The record of the pretrial *524conference indicates that the parties anticipated having blood tests taken prior to trial. Although tests were scheduled at one point during the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Sam v. BalardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Artibee v. Cheboygan Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baumgardner v. BalmerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kenner v. WathaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. in Re J L Thomas MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API