Schepflin, Baldwin, Tweedy & Co. v. Small

JAMES, Ci-iief Justice.

This cause is presented to us on agreed facts. The controlling facts appear to be these:

Maurice Ullman was indebted to plaintiffs in error on a judgment for $1070.08, and by virtue thereof plaintiffs instituted garnishment proceedings against Ben Small, the defendant in error, who was a tenant occupying separate real property of Louisa Ullman, the wife of Maurice Ullman. It appeared that soon after the garnishment Ullman and wife conveyed all the wife’s separate realty (consisting of the premises occupied by Small, and other similar property, all occupied by tenants…