Armengol v. Richter
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Webb County; E. A. Stevens, Judge. Action by A. C. Richter against M. Valdez, in which a writ of garnishment was issued against F. IT. Lithgow, and in which J. A. Armengol filed a plea of intervention, claiming that he had obtained a writ of garnishment which was entitled to precedence. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff Richter, Armengol and others appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFly, J.
Appellee obtained a writ of garnishment against F. H. Lithgow in a suit instituted by him against M. Valdez to recover the sum of $018.49 on May 29, 1908, and it was served on the same day. On June 3, 1910, Lithgow answered that Valdez had a judgment against him for $800, and that he was indebted to him in that sum. On January 3, 1911, Armengol filed a plea in intervention, claiming that he had obtained a writ of garnishment against Lithgow which should have precedence over that of appellee. On the same day M. Valdez, the defendant in the original suit, filed his plea in intervention,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waples-Platter Grocer Co. v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Gause v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Mensing v. EngelkeTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Schepflin, Baldwin, Tweedy & Co. v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Tirrell v. CanadaTexas Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frankfurt's Texas Investment Corp. v. Trinity Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Cain v. City of TylerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Canfield v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Way v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931