Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Moore Bros.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 21, 1890No. 6563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from McLennan County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Will-son, J.

§ 145. Garnishment; judgment against garnishee; erroneous in the absence of either an affidavit, bond, writ, or evidence of their loss, or that such papers ever existed; case stated. One Edmunds was garnished by appellees as the debtor of Potts Bros., and he answered that he leased from appellants a lumber-yard, for which he agreed to pay them at the rate of $400 per annum, to be paid quarterly in instalments of $100 each; that there was then due by him on said contract of lease $100, and that other instalments would become due on said contract at said rate for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gause v. ConeTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Friedman Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Medley v. American Radiator Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Davis v. ChilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Burkitt v. GlenneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Schepflin, Baldwin, Tweedy & Co. v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API