Legal Opinion

Winston & Co. v. Clark County Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 16, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas —

Affirming.

The appellant and defendant below, Winston & Company, is a partnership, and will hereafter be referred to as defendants. The appellee and plaintiff below, Clark County Construction Company, is a corporation, and will hereafter be referred to as plaintiff.

The plaintiff, claiming a contract with the defendants to construct a concrete culvert and a concrete viaduct on a line of railroad between Winchester, Kentucky, and Irvine. Kentucky, brought this suit to recover the unpaid balance of $5,048.43 alleged to be due it in the performance of such work.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Geary v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Bates v. EmeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Watts v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gruschus v. CR Davis Contracting CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Walker v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Federal Chemical Co. v. Pioneer Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Rochell v. Moore-Handley Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Ross v. Ross' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API