Rochell v. Moore-Handley Hardware Co.

FOSTER, Justice.

The question in this case, as it comes to us, is a proper interpretation of the facts recited in the opinion of the Court of Appeals.. The contention is that on that basis the verdict of the jury should have been set aside because those facts overwhelmingly show that appellee extended credit solely to Smith, rather than to appellant Rochell or to Smith and Rochell jointly, in the sale of a bill of hardware for use in a house Smith was building as agent for Rochell, whereby he was to receive a fee for his services, and all bills were to be paid by him. The agreement was in…