Legal Opinion

State v. Nix

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 2012No. CRH090155; A145386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

The state appeals from a judgment merging guilty verdicts against defendant that the jury rendered on 20 counts of second-degree animal neglect, ORS 167.325, into a single conviction under ORS 161.067(2)1 The trial court concluded that defendant’s repeated violations of ORS 167.325 did not involve “two or more victims” because animals are not victims under ORS 161.067(2). Accordingly, this case presents the question of whether an animal described in ORS 167.325 is a victim for purposes of ORS 167.067(2). We conclude that it is. Accordingly, there are as many victims as there are violations of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. Hirsch/FriendOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. GlaspeyOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. LuersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NixOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. FessendenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. NixOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. NewcombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. NixOregon Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API