Legal Opinion

Weatherly v. Wilkie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2000No. 18-99-01487; CA A105700PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Respondent appeals from a judgment granting petitioner’s request for a permanent stalking protective order (SPO). The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the order. On de novo review of the facts (ORS 19.415(3); Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 537, 953 P2d 1130, rev den 328 Or 418 (1998)), we reverse.

The controlling legal principles are not disputed. Briefly summarized, and as applicable to this case, the civil stalking statute authorizes a court to issue an SPO against someone who intentionally, knowingly or recklessly makes “repeated and unwanted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Leo v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Delgado v. SoudersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Christensen v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Castro v. HeinzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API