State v. Jumpp
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
Opinion *757The defendant, Junior Jumpp, appeals from the denial of his motion for sentence modification made pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-39. The defendant has completed the sentence that was the subject of his motion. This court cannot grant the defendant any practical relief, and therefore his appeal is moot. State v. Bradley , 137 Conn.App. 585, 587 n.1, 49 A.3d 297, cert. denied, 307 Conn. 939, 56 A.3d 950 (2012) ; see also State v. Boyle , 287 Conn. 478, 485-86, 949 A.2d 460 (2008) ; State v. Scott , 83 Conn.App. 724, 726-27, 851 A.2d 353 (2004). We also summarily *823reject the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ScottConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. BradleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JumppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017