State v. Scott
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Stanley Scott, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a trial to the court, of disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him, (2) the statute is either unconstitutionally vague “as applied” to him or overbroad and (3) one of the conditions of his conditional discharge violates his rights under the first amendment to the federal constitution. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The evidence adduced at trial established the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Barlow v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. ElseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CulverConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. SimmonsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. MaloneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- State v. AndriulaitisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.