Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2008No. 2008-0037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Thomas Joel Manning of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0059759, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1992. On November 22, 2006, we suspended respondent’s license to practice for two years after finding that he had committed professional misconduct, including having falsely told clients that he had filed and settled their medical-malpractice claim. Disciplinary Counsel v. Manning, 111 Ohio St.3d 349, 2006-Ohio-5794, 856 N.E.2d 259.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent’s license for six…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RooneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Pigott.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. ManningOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API