Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Association v. Watson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 2015No. 2015-0593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, David Charles Watson Jr. of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0025989, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1985. In August 2012, we found that he had committed multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct regulating client trust accounts, and we sanctioned him with a one-year suspension, fully stayed on conditions, including that he enter into a contract with the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program (“OLAP”) and serve a period of monitored probation. See Columbus Bar Assn. v. Watson, 132 Ohio St.3d 496, 2012-Ohio-3830, 974 N.E.2d 103, ¶ 15. Watson…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Medina County Bar Association v. MalynnOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dayton Bar Assn. v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 2013

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wood County Bar Association v. Driftmyer.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Harter.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MaciakOhio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Columbus Bar Association v. Rieser.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Rosett.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API