Legal Opinion
Patsaw v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided September 23, 1944No. Civ. A. No. 909PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PORTERIE, District Judge.
We quote the “Agreed Statement of Facts” in this case with the dual purpose of making it a part of the finding of facts and a narrative of the case.
“The defendant is a railroad company, engaged in interstate commerce, its railroad running from Missouri, through the states of Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas.
“That the plaintiff, Stacy Patsaw, for more than a month prior to the accident sued on, was a member of a section crew, working for the defendant, and engaged every day in interstate commerce, repairing, replacing and keeping in gopd order defendant’s interstate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New York Central Railroad v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Holl v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1947
- Ernhart v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Rainwater v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Shoenfelt v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.