Dayton v. City of Asheville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
This action was instituted on 6 May, 1921, by T. J. Dayton and wife against the city of Asheville to recover damages or compensation for the partial taking or injury to two houses and lots, located in said city, the alleged injury or damage resulting, according to the plaintiff’s contention, from the construction, maintenance, and operation by the defendant, in the exercise of a governmental duty, of an incinerator, for the purpose of destroying and burning city garbage, refuse, etc., on an adjacent lot, or one in close proximity to plaintiffs’ property. There was allegation and evidence…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Lloyd v. Albemarle & Raleigh R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Carter Ex Rel. Clap v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.