Macomb County v. AFSCME Council 25
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
Respondents-appellants employ members of the charging party-appellee labor unions. Pursuant to their respective collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs), respondents provide pension benefits to their employees. The CBAs provide the employees with various pension plan options, including one in which payments terminate at the death of the employee (straight-life pension) and another in which pension benefits continue until the death of both the employee and his or her spouse (joint- and-survivor pension or optional benefits plan). Since 1982, a particular mortality table was used to calculate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. MastersMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MacOmb County v. AFSCME Council 25 Locals 411 & 893Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
- 51382 Gratiot Avenue Holdings, LLC v. Chesterfield Development Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- MacOmb County v. AFSCME Council 25 Locals 411 & 893Michigan Supreme Court · 2013