Legal Opinion
Deutsch v. Carl Zeiss, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 8, 1981No. 80 Civ. 3051 (JMC)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for physiological and psychological damages is granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
FACTS
Plaintiff Alice Deutsch commenced this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act [“ADEA”], 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and New York’s age discrimination statute, N.Y.Exee.Law §§ 296-301 (McKinney 1972 & Supp.1980), alleging that defendant Carl Zeiss, Inc. [“Zeiss”] unlawfully terminated her employment because of her age. In addition to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 920, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,417 Miriam E. Geller, Cross-Appellee v. Walter Markham, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Williams v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cedillo v. Valcar Enterprises & Darling Delaware Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
- Ritter v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Mayer v. Manton Cork Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.