Cedillo v. Valcar Enterprises & Darling Delaware Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FITZWATER, District Judge:
Plaintiff’s motion to remand presents the questions whether a workers’ compensation retaliation action made nonremovable by 28 U.S.C. § 1445(c) becomes removable when pendent to a federal question claim and whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the retaliation claim.
I
Plaintiff Agripin Cedillo (“Cedillo”) sued defendant Valcar Enterprises & Darling Delaware Company, Inc. (“Valcar”) on March 19, 1990 in Texas state court for violating the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (“TCHRA”), Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 5221k, § 1.01 et seq. (West…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Lott v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Bookman v. ShubzdaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- Godfrey v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Brown v. Crop Hail Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.