City of Indianapolis v. Marold
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Marion Superior Court. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
—Appellee brought this action to recover for personal injuries received by him by falling off a bridge in the city of Indianapolis on the evening of the 15th day of October, 1896. The bridge crosses the canal at Vermont street in said city, and was at the time resting upon jacks *429and scaffolds for the purpose of constructing a new wall beneath the same, so that it could be lowered to correspond with a new pavement then being constructed upon Vermont street. The cause was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of appellee for $5,000. Answers to interrogatories were returned with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Storrs v. . the City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Russell v. Inhabitants of ColumbiaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Brusso v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Moore v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- City of Hammond v. JahnkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Drake v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.