Brusso v. . City of Buffalo
New York Court of Appeals
The nature of this action and the facts pertinent to the material questions discussed appear in the following extract from the opinion: “ This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of the alleged negligence of defendant in leaving open an unguarded excavation in one of its streets, called Seneca street, into which the plaintiff fell while crossing the street, receiving serious injury.
Read the full summary
The nature of this action and the facts pertinent to the material questions discussed appear in the following extract from the opinion: “ This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of the alleged negligence of defendant in leaving open an unguarded excavation in one of its streets, called Seneca street, into which the plaintiff fell while crossing the street, receiving serious injury. “ The excavation was made under the direction of the water department of the city by a contractor with that department. The plaintiff, in attempting to cross the…
1Opinion of the Court
Earl, J.,
reads for affirmance, with costs.
All concur, except Tbacy, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by58 opinions
- Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Pomfrey v. . Village of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Pettengill v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.