Legal Opinion

Drake v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1902No. 4254PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. George Meade Emory, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

The respondents, who were plaintiffs below, are husband and wife. They brought this action to recover for personal injuries received by the wife from a fall into an opening made in one of the public streets of the city of Seattle by certain persons who were engaged under a contract with the city in laying a sewer therein. In laying the sewer the contractors did not dig a continuous trench or ditch along the surface of the ground, but dug a series of openings certain distances apart, and connected these by running tunnels from one to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Park v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. City of Indianapolis v. MaroldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Tanguma v. Yakima CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. Hunter v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lindquist v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Boggess v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API