Legal Opinion
Watson v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1920No. 16058PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Reynolds, J., entered March 3, 1920, upon findings in favor, of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Summons and complaint in this, action were served upon the Frank Everett Company, at Chehalis, Washington, the respondent contending that that company was an agent of the appellant, a foreign corporation doing business within the state. The appellant moved to quash the service of summons, which motion was denied, and that ruling is assigned as error on this appeal.
Section 226, subd. 9, Rem. Code, provides:
“The summons shall be served by delivering copy thereof, if the suit be against a foreign corporation or *111nonresident joint stock company or association doing business within this state, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barrett Manufacturing Co. v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mikolas v. Hiram Walker & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Grams v. Idaho National Harvester Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Womach v. Case Threshing Machine Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pacific Typesetting Co. v. International Typographical UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. ManionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- McDonald Service Co. v. People's National Bank of Rock HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Whitehouse v. Cities Service Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.