Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC v. Gainey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendants contend that the reservation of the sand and gravel rights in the deed of Bryan Rock and Sand Company to defendants is void for vagueness, but if not void for vagueness, constituted a right extending only to Bryan Rock and Sand Company to select the 35-acre tract.
We agree with defendants that the easement now before us leaves a lot to be desired with respect to certainty and clarity and suffers greatly when compared to the reservation approved in Reynolds v. Sand Co., 263 N.C. 609, 139 S.E. 2d 888 (1964). Nevertheless, we are, in our opinion, bound by the result…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Pergerson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Reynolds v. BV Hedrick Gravel & Sand Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. DaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC, Inc. v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Johnson v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Oxendine v. MossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983