Legal Opinion

Byerly v. Byerly

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 7822SC19PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court’s “granting of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence on the grounds that the defendant failed to specify the specific grounds for the motion and on the grounds that there were questions of fact which were to be determined by the jury.”

G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a) provides: “A motion for a directed verdict shall state the specific grounds therefor.” Our appellate courts have held this direction to be mandatory, Anderson v. Butler, 284 N.C. 723, 202 S.E. 2d 585 (1974); Wheeler v. Denton, 9 *553…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Carlisle v. . CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Rhodes v. RaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Garrison v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Taylor v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Green v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API