Oxendine v. Moss
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
In their sole assignment of error, defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to permit the jury to find existence of an account stated.
Although plaintiff’s complaint alleged and plaintiff’s evidence tended to support two separate theories of recovery for his services, i.e., work performed and an account stated, defendants, the moving party, failed to state to the trial court any specific grounds for their motion for a directed verdict, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Pergerson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Johnson v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lee v. KeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984