Legal Opinion

Oxendine v. Moss

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1983No. 8220DC1019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In their sole assignment of error, defendants contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence to permit the jury to find existence of an account stated.

Although plaintiff’s complaint alleged and plaintiff’s evidence tended to support two separate theories of recovery for his services, i.e., work performed and an account stated, defendants, the moving party, failed to state to the trial court any specific grounds for their motion for a directed verdict, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Pergerson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Johnson v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Builders Supplies Co. of Goldsboro, NC v. GaineyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lee v. KeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API