Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Equine Clinics, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1988No. 3280PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County denying a motion to remove a compulsory nonsuit against appellants Edward Durkin, James Durkin, and Herve Filion [referred to collectively as “the Durkins”], who filed suit individually and as Snow Shoe Farms. In so doing, appellants in effect appeal the trial court’s decision to grant a motion in limine disallowing certain statements to be introduced as evidence at trial.

This appeal arises out of the death of appellants’ standardbred stallion, Josiah, who died, apparently of anaphylactic…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Tops Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bank of America, N.A. v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. Woodland Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Rizzo v. MichenerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. B & L Asphalt Industries, Inc. v. FuscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Havasy v. ResnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API