Legal Opinion

Kovalev v. Sowell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2003PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY GRACI, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Sergei Kovalev (“Kova-lev”), appeals pro se from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on February 28, 2003, 1 denying his motion to remove a compulsory nonsuit entered in favor of Appellee, Daniel Sowell (“Sowell”). We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Kovalev and Sowell were involved in an automobile accident in November, 2000, in Philadelphia. Kovalev, acting pro se, filed a negligence action against Sowell on October 22, 2001, seeking damages for “severe traumatic personal injuries to his spine in [the] form of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Rauch v. Mike-MayerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Com. v. Ray, T., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Wexler v. HechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Weiner v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Callahan v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Seels v. Tenet Health System Hahnemann, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API