Legal Opinion

Flanary v. Briscoe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1941No. 30132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for the plaintiff for less than claimed in an action in damages for personal injury. A motion to dismiss has been filed which alleges that no exceptions were saved to the rulings of the trial court during the proceedings on the trial. A response has been filed which, in effect, admits that no exceptions were saved at the trial, but alleges that a motion for new trial was duly filed and overruled, and that this court has held in McCoy v. Braden Co., 173 Okla. 113, 46 P. 2d 960, that an appeal will not be dismissed as frivolous where it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Security Benefit Ass'n v. LloydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Burgess v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. New v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Elsea Bros. v. KillianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Atkinson v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George H. Cash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. Tulsa Defense Houses, Inc. v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Berry v. CrutchmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. George H. Cash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API