Tulsa Defense Houses, Inc. v. Copeland
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff filed an action to foreclose a mechanic’s and material-men’s lien. Defendant filed an answer denying the amount claimed and seeking recovery on a cross-petition. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $1,647.58, after a closely contested trial in which the defendant disputed the issue of fact as to the amount due.
The sole issue presented in this court is that there is no allegation and proof of compliance with the law requiring the return for assessment for taxes of intangible property as required by 68 O. S. 1941 §1515. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rutter v. HeatlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Richards v. ClaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Flanary v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Whitney v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Wheatley Industries, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Supply DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Lloyd v. Midwest Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Western Surety Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958