Person v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court in this matter are (1) the defendants’ motion of March 30, 1983, to dismiss all claims arising under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343, 2201, & 2202 and the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and to dismiss the complaint as to defendants Carl E. Webb, George McLaughlin, and the United States Department of Agriculture; and (2) the defendants’ motion of August 3, 1984, to dismiss this action in toto, on the grounds that the plaintiff has failed to pursue an active prosecution of his claims. For the reasons stated herein,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henry Howell v. CataldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Ralph M. Hackley v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. DaltonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- DesRoches v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
- Mitchell v. ChaoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005
- Blong v. Secretary of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995