Legal Opinion

Blong v. Secretary of the Army

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 28, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-4147-DESPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on Major General James F. Rueger and Chief Warrant Officer Richard E. Cordwell’s motions to be dropped as defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 (Doc. 47) and to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment (Doc. 66) and the Secretary of the Army’s (“Secretary”) motion for summary judgment (Doc. 64).

Plaintiff brings this action alleging defendants unlawfully discriminated against her under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, by refusing to hire…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carr v. Woodbury County Juvenile Detention CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
  2. Aquilino v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. McGrady v. MattisDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API