Legal Opinion
Acker v. Provident National Bank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-2343PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
On November 27, 1972, plaintiffs Fred Acker and Kenneth C. Dabrow brought this action individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated against the defendants Provident National Bank and Philadelphia National Bank (hereinafter “Provident” and “PNB” respectively), to recover statutory damages for the alleged violation of the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 85, 86), the Pennsylvania Goods and Services Installment Sales Act (Pa.Stat. Ann. tit. 69 § 1101 et seq. (1966)), the Pennsylvania Banking Code of 1965 (Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 7 § 301 et…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Murphy v. Colonial Federal Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- James W. Partain v. The First National Bank of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Northway Lanes v. Hackley Union National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United Missouri Bank of Kansas City v. DanforthDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1975
- Acker v. Provident National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Durkin v. The National Bank Of OlyphantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Izaguirre v. TankersleyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.