Legal Opinion
Acker v. Provident National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 21, 1975No. 74-1432PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before ALDISERT, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges. GARTH, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal, we are called upon to decide: (1) which of two arguably applicable statutes governs the rate of interest which national banks in Pennsylvania may charge on revolving credit card accounts;1 and (2) whether the applicable Pennsylvania law allows the defendant banks to charge “interest-on-interest” in connection with such accounts. The district court held that the defend*731ant banks could charge the 15% rate authorized by the Pennsylvania Goods and Services Installment Sales Act (hereinafter,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- James W. Partain v. The First National Bank of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Novicki v. O'MaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Kansas City v. DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wright v. SchockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Jungkurth v. Eastern Financial Services, Inc. (In Re Rhoda Jungkurth)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re JordanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re SoudersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Wright v. SchockCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.