Legal Opinion
United Missouri Bank of Kansas City v. Danforth
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 29, 1975No. 75 CV 38-C to 75 CV 41-C, 75 CV 43-C, 75 CV 47-C and 75 CV 50-CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS, OPINION AND JUDGMENT
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in these consolidated cases are all national banking associations created and.operating under the National Banking Act, 12 U.S.C. § 21 et seq., and all located in the State of Missouri. They have brought the above-styled individual actions against John C. Dan-forth, Attorney General for the State of Missouri, seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction against the defendant’s commencing and prosecution of quo warranto proceedings for plaintiffs’ alleged violation of the usury provisions of the Missouri Retail Credit…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Swift & Co. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- M. Nahas & Co., Inc. v. First National Bank of Hot SpringsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fred Fisher, on Behalf of Himself and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. First National Bank of Omaha, Omaha, NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Fred Fisher v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- State of North Dakota v. Merchants National Bank and Trust Company, Fargo, North DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.