Legal Opinion

American Scantic Line, Inc. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 9, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

This action at law was brought under the Tucker Act, 24 Stat. 505, to recover:

1. Three thousand dollars for expenditures in caring for shipwrecked seamen and covered by the first cause of action.

It is conceded by respondent that $1,-582.64 is recoverable if the Court determines there is liability.

2. Two thousand nine hundred twenty-five dollars for repatriation of the shipwrecked seamen covered by the second, third and fourth causes of action.

It is conceded by respondent that the sum of $2,156 is recoverable if the Court determines there is liability.

3. One thousand…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alaska Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Brusselback v. Cago CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
  3. Heil v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  4. Alaska S. S. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1932
  5. Alaska S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. DickDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941
  2. United States v. TotDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API