Legal Opinion

Alaska Steamship Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1933No. 56PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

In this suit, brought under the Tucker Act, 24 Stat. 505, in the District Court for Western Washington, petitioner sought compensation at an agreed rate for the transportation of certain destitute seamen from Ketchikan, Alaska, to Seattle, under the provisions of § 4578 R.S., as amended, 46 U.S.C. § 679. That section imposes on masters of United States vessels homeward bound the duty, upon request of consular officers, to receive and carry destitute seamen to the port of destination at such compensation not exceeding a specified amount as may be agreed upon by the master with a consular…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. United States v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. W. W. Tuttle, Resident Manager, Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Monarch Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  5. Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API