Legal Opinion

American Steel Barge Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Coal Agency Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 19, 1902No. 391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

Both parties have filed petitions for a rehearing under our rule, with reference to the judgment entered in this case in accordance with our opinion passed down on April 16, 1902. 115 Fed. 669. The libelant complains that we denied interest and costs, and also of our deductions from the amount due according to the bill of lading; and, on the other hand, the claimant complains of our refusal to allow what was alleged in the answer as a general set-off of an amount which would more than have absorbed the entire freight. There is also in the petitions some discussion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. St. Louis Ore & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. American Steel Barge Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Coal Agency Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prozina Shipping Co. v. Thirty-four AutomobilesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  2. George D. Emery Co. v. Tweedie Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1905
  3. Hastorf v. Degnon-McLean Contracting Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1904
  4. Hildebrand v. Geneva Mill Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1929
  5. Davidson v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API