Griffin v. City of Roseburg
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Plaintiffs bring this declaratory judgment suit to obtain a decree declaring that the proceedings purT porting to annex as a part of the City of Boseburg certain land, including their own, was invalid. Plaintiffs appeal from a decree in favor of defendant.
Plaintiffs are owners of parcels of land within a tract which was declared by a city ordinance adopted in March, 1964 to be annexed to the City of Boseburg. The validity of the annexation is attacked on the ground that the tract proposed to be annexed was not predetermined ■ and designated at the time plaintiffs and other land owners were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Bennett Trust Co. v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Greenberg v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Petersen v. MAYOR ETC. CITY OF KLAMATH FALLSOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Cincinnati ex rel. Crotty v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GusmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stewart v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- People ex rel. Shults v. Lombard, New York County Courts1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.