City of Cincinnati ex rel. Crotty v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is a generally accepted rule that in absence of fraud or collusion, a judgment for or against a governmental body, such as a municipal corporation, is binding and conclusive as res judicata on all residents, citizens and taxpayers with respect to matters adjudicated which are of general and public interest,1 except where the proceedings were not of an adversary character.2 This rule *29is in accordance with the general policy favoring finality of judgments where a matter has been litigated upon the merits. Where, as here, the case involves a single cause of action, the prior judgment is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Quinn v. State Ex Rel. LeroyOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Greenberg v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Lakewood v. ReesOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Griffin v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stromberg v. Bd. of Edn. of BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Morganelli v. Building Inspector of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- City of Canton v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- City Of Canton, Ohio v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Voleck v. Village of Powhatan PointOhio Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.