Legal Opinion

Brassey v. Peck

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1942No. 6961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

— March 19, 1940, W. C. Brassey, in his own name and in the names of Eric Dokka, Mary J. Brassey, John Dokka, Henrietta R. Penrod, George Stiles, Joe Ellis and Jane Ellis, with the knowledge and consent of all except Henrietta R. Penrod, located certain placer mining ground situate in the Placerville mining District of Boise County, Idaho, called the Lux Claim; and on the same day W. C. Brassey and his wife, Mary J. Brassey, located other placer mining ground situate in the same mining district and called the Lux No. 2. Thereafter to-wit, March 21 and March 22, 1940, Fred T. Peck and Anne…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Riverside Sand & Cement Manufacturing Co. v. HardwickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Wilson v. Triumph Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Morton v. Solambo Copper Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Tornanses v. MelsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API