Rundle v. Republic Cement Corporation
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
This is an appeal by Edgar Rundle, et al., defendants below, from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Republic Cement Corporation, quieting its title to certain placer mining claims on unappropriated government land. The primary question presented is whether the evidence, taken in a light most favorable to plaintiff, sustains the findings of fact and judgment entered therein. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff or Republic, and defendants.
The plaintiff corporation brought this action to quiet its title, as against defendants’, to twenty-eight unpatented…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Trinidad Coal & Coking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Gird v. California Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1894
- Saxman v. ChristmannArizona Supreme Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Bagg v. New Jersey Loan CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Geomet Exploration, Ltd. v. Lucky Mc Uranium Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Schwarz v. UlmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Walkeng Mining Company v. CoveyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.