Morton v. Solambo Copper Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.
This action was brought to recover an undivided interest in a copper mining claim called the Solambo Claim. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below and the defendant appealed. The case comes before us upon the following statement:
“ On the trial it was proven that at the time of the location of the Solambo Claim the mining customs, usages and regulations in force in the mining district where said claim is located (there being no written mining laws) adopted and in use in locating such claims were : That the discoverer placed up a notice on the vein or…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
- Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Stevens v. Grand Central Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.