Legal Opinion
State v. Helmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1926No. 25,513PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The county attorney of Hennepin county filed an information charging that defendant had wilfully and unlawfully removed and concealed a certain automobile which was subject to a contract of conditional sale whereby the title thereto was held by the Otas Finance Company as security for a debt. Defendant demurred to the information and contended that the statute under which the prosecution was brought contravenes section 27 of article 4 of the Constitution which reads:
“No law shall embrace more than one subject which shall be expressed in its title.”
The trial court overruled the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Merchants National Bank v. City of East Grand ForksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- State ex rel. Olson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Remick v. ClousingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 271, State Question No. 408Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- State v. Wong HingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.