Legal Opinion

State v. Wong Hing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1929No. 26,932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, C.

Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of a violation of a provision of an ordinance governing the erection and maintenance of signs attached to buildings and projecting over streets or sidewalks. He appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The ordinance is the general building ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. It contains many separate sections and provisions. The title of the ordinance is: “An ordinance to regulate the construction, alteration, maintenance, repair and removal of buildings within the city of Minneapolis.” The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  3. Evison v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. State v. Bridgeman & Russell Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Williams v. RolfeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Marquette v. Police CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Congress Hotel Co. v. Samuel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
  5. In Re Detachment of Agricultural LandsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API