Legal Opinion
Edell & Associates v. Law Offices of Peter Angelos
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 25, 2000No. Civil L-99-3546PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Before this Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. The parties have extensively briefed the motions, and the Court dispenses with a hearing. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1999). For the reasons stated below, the Court will, by separate Order, GRANT Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENY Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint.
I. Background
A. Maryland Tobacco Litigation
This case arises from several states’ recent litigation against the tobacco industry.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Norris Shealy v. Honorable William L. Winston Honorable Thomas R. Monroe, Honorable Joseph C. GwaltneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paramount Brokers, Inc. v. Digital River, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Steigerwald v. BradleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001