Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael St. Hubert
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 15, 2018No. 16-10874PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
We sua sponte vacate our panel opinion, United States v. St. Hubert , 883 F.3d 1319 (11th Cir. 2018) (" St. Hubert I "), and issue this new opinion. In this direct appeal, Michael St. Hubert challenges his two firearm convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) claiming his predicate Hobbs Act robbery and attempted robbery offenses do not constitute crimes of violence under § 924(c)(3). After oral argument in 2018, we affirmed St. Hubert's § 924(c) firearm convictions, concluding his predicate robbery offenses qualified as crimes of violence under both the residual and elements…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Justin TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Michael Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Dane GillisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.