Irma Ovalles v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NEWSOM, Circuit Judge:
The question before us is whether one of the key provisions of an important federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c), is unconstitutionally vague. As relevant to our purposes, § 924(c) makes it a federal offense-punishable by a term of imprisonment ranging from five years to life-for any person to use, carry, or possess a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence." 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(A). The provision challenged here- § 924(c)(3)'s "residual clause"-defines the term "crime of violence" to mean a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that…
2Cases cited131 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.