Legal Opinion

Irma Ovalles v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 2018No. 17-10172PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge:

The question before us is whether one of the key provisions of an important federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c), is unconstitutionally vague. As relevant to our purposes, § 924(c) makes it a federal offense-punishable by a term of imprisonment ranging from five years to life-for any person to use, carry, or possess a firearm in connection with a "crime of violence." 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(A). The provision challenged here- § 924(c)(3)'s "residual clause"-defines the term "crime of violence" to mean a felony "that by its nature, involves a substantial risk that…

2Cases cited131 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  3. United States v. Joseph SimmsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API